adidas Originals have blessed us with a ritzy Newburgh watch to give away to our loyal followers.
adidas Originals sponsored London's Streetfest, and we've got recap pics from the very colourful event. ...
Master mask crafter Freehand Profit puts the Air Jordan 4 under the blade for his newest creation.
Stussy resurrects a classic with a modern edge. Look inside for the Summer 2013 '8 Ball' Lookbook.
When we get a second to chill on a business trip, you know we're gonna go sneaker shopping!
Action Bronson loves the NB, and he told Acclaim magazine why when he popped by SF HQ.
Roger Federer gets his game face on with Nike waging a backhand war of a new kind.
i thought it would be good to have a thread like this and hopefully becomes a sticky.
i hate calling us in the hobby now a "sneakerhead". to me, the word sneakerhead is an oxymoron. being a head on something denotes knowledge, top of the class. kids calling themselves sneakerheads yet cant tell a jumpman facing the "right way" is just not on. eveni, who have been in the hobby for so long, cant even dare call myself a head because i dont know everything. i can understand James Bond of Undedeated take on it. The “sneaker head" so to speak is no longer a viable business model as the true (sneaker) head has become almost non-existent". personally people producing the japanese magazines before the internet in the 90s are the true heads. yes, we can all call ourselves having a passion on sneakers but all having a knowledge? yes a few but all, i afraid not.
anyway so with this sneaker q&a, we can share, pass info and in the end acquire knowledge so one day we have the right to be called a "head".
i start it off with this first Q. once answered and settled, we post the next Q. sounds good? ok.
why cant nike produce more quantities of limited sneakers e.g. yeezy2, that everybody wants?
the simplest answer to this really is "marketing".
historically, nike as a business undergone a series of restructures depending on the trend of athetic market share conditions. Through its emergence in the 70s, worldwide expansion growth in the 80s due to aggressive marketing, market dominance in the early to mid 90s where the focus is on the athlete ie michael jordan, sergei bubka, andre agassi, bo jackson, and the slippage in market share in late 90s due to teenagers moving to 'brown shoes' ie timberland and finally admitting to non social responsibility issues eg child labour. In the early 2000, Phil Knight succumbed to pressure and overhauled the way nike handles its core operations & distributions. By 2002, Nike turned a corner. Surprisingly, the turnaround stemmed in large part not from clever marketing or new high-tech sneakers but from concentrating more attention on the more mundane aspects of running a business, such as investing in start-of-the-art information systems, logistics, and supply-chain management. In Australia, this is the end of mom & pop stores and birth to "tier" accounts and exclusivity, sneaker buotique houses. whew. long read. lol
basically, limited editions sneakers that nike produces is for the benefit of the nike account holders. in a way nike created this exclusive market so they have to produce it for them. produce a product, market the product to the target demographics. marketing 101
furthermore, human nature reacts to want something more something they cant have. similar to single girls falling for married men. hahaha yeah right.
next question, guys 
=k=
Offline
| 29 months ago |
good one K (did you get my text?)
reminds me of the ask uncle inch thread from years back haha, but more serious sneaker oriented it appears
small question: what's up with more recent releases having that NRG thing on the box label, e.g. Galaxy Foams / all star release, the recent Safari pack and I'm sure other Nikes of late. New type of QS/TZ system?
Last edited by minhyy (29 months ago)
Offline
| 29 months ago |
What was the question?
Offline
| 29 months ago |
good thread..
@min.. NRG is a new account for NSW.. It has sort of taken over from QS/TZ
It is a limited account so i guess it would fall between QS and TZ..
Gentry is the man behind it as i coincided with his move to NSW from JB.. More details when i find out myself..
Last edited by angelfunk (29 months ago)
Offline
| 29 months ago |
perhaps my view is too simplistic, but given that Nike, yes, is a business, wouldn't they be better off making and selling more?
Offline
| 29 months ago |
Good question minhyy I was thinking the same myself.
Offline
| 29 months ago |
I get the whole "it limited, so people will want it more" but makeing is so limited and hard to get that the resellers make more than nike did and a pile of peeps are pissed off, just seem dumb.
Offline
| 29 months ago |
there is no magic number.
Offline
| 29 months ago |
42
Offline
| 29 months ago |
^ that is the meaning of life.
Offline
| 29 months ago |
yeah bro Quazza, wish it was that simple
in the old days the distribution allocation is proportional across the board. the bigger chains get more, mom & pop get less. everyone has a share of the pie. i could walk in a mom & pop store in campsie buy the jordans i want. if sold out go to rebel.
thanks bro angelfunk. i read a few bits about the NRG bit but first time learned that its Gentry's baby. sadly i think its another marketing ploy on building a "brand". now all kids will be looking for the NRG on the label just like the craze back in the early nikesb days.
nike dont care once it leave its warehouse straight to the retailers shelves as theyre practically sold in their books. so it dont care about the after sale market as well ie the resellers, unless its counterfiet and it hurts their sales and their image. just look at the aggressive fight done by LV on the counterfeiters.
=k=
Offline
| 29 months ago |
Well with that being said(the nrg taking over qs/tz accounts), will that now usher in a new kind of limited edition kicks or is it just a revamp of their marketing strategies with their exclusives?
Offline
| 28 months ago |
In a nutshell shooster its all about marketing.. Bro K summed it up perfectly.
They want you to believe everything is limited/exclusive.. Those are the 2 key words in the modern sneaker world..
Offline
| 28 months ago |
I think the perk of Nike making them limited is that they don't sit on shelves whilst people wait to see if they'll end up at the outlets... Say its limited and people will bite the bullet and fork over the cash to ensure they get them... resellers don't bother Nike because the shoe gets sold for the margin they have calculated for and having people talking about sold out shoes just increases people buying ASAP on the next release...
Offline
| 28 months ago |
Hi have a question. What happens to the shit that flat out doesn't sell? It sits there, then goes on sale, and still sits there...
Does it get sent back to (say) Nike? Does the store pay for it?
Offline
| 28 months ago |
^the sneaker freaker scavengers haunt the outlets, stock up, sit on them and rock & resell years later.
But good question, where do they all go? Any Outlet staff can answer?
Does NRG totally replace QS & TZ?
New South Wales & Nike Sports Wear. I thought it was weird with people wearing proddie representing NSW! haha
Then again it was like 10+ years people wearing Champion USA hoodies! LOL
... maybe we are sneakerbrains!
we think sneakers lots to be on this forum and discussing our hobby/interest
Offline
| 28 months ago |
well I can't answer the question, but I can provide an example of this outlet mystery. When the Nike Shield pack came out, I went to the Nike store in Sydney Westfields to see if there were any pairs of the Lunarglide 3s left, but they had sold out, and likewise with many other retailers such as Athlete's Foot. However, months later, there was a full size run of the LG3s and pairs did not seem to run out. Mysterious.
Offline
| 28 months ago |
lg3's - stock from one of other stores could of been moved to the sydney store.
unsold stuff prob goes back, gets destroyed. Sounds unreasonable, but companies sometimes destroy stock if not needed.
Offline
| 28 months ago |
nice q bro Quazza. questions we have raised are inter related. i mentioned above, nike change its business model in the supply chain, distribution and allocation of inventory to the benefit of the business trading partners it created.
say nikehq finalised its product line for next year. the licensed distributor eg Nikeoz sends out their sales persons to the retailers to determine xxx number of units to order. nikehq warehouse then ships units to licensed distributor to allocate the stock to the retailers below:
1. buy & sell retailer
2. consignmeny retailer
3. retail arm of official distributor licensee
Q. What happens to the shit that flat out doesn't sell?
1. buy & sell retailer
retailer buys from distributor then sell at msrp. the status of unsold stock is in line with trading contract signed with nike.
a TZ account holder can not mark down the price low enough to move because nike wants to protect its image by price control eg espionage can not markdown sale over 20% i think. so its a catch 22 to have a "TZ" account because you have to move it otherwise it sits there and can not return as unsold unless its defective.
a bigger retail chain however can have a much lower markdown like FL/Rebel where 50% is allowed to move stock. again, they can not return to nike as unsold stock but FL/Rebel can sell its unsold stock to their own outlet.
2. consignment retailer
in emerging economy countries where nike wants a build a bigger market presence, they allow consignment trading. Nike sends goods to a consignment store who pays Nike only as and when the goods are sold. Nike remains the owner of the goods until they are paid for in full and, after a certain period, takes back the unsold goods.
moreover, since nike changes its product lines every three months, Nike needed to remove unsold merchandise quickly from retail stores and move it to Nike outlet stores as the new stock arrived.
3. licensed distributor retail arm
nike hq sends more stock than ordered so the distributor, nikeoz first try to offer them to retailers otherwise these extra stock goes to their retail arm ie nikestore. then any unsold stock goes to the nike outlet. i bet this is how it went down with LG3.
hope it makes sense lol anyway thats how i think it works.
=k=
Last edited by kuyakoy (28 months ago)
Offline
| 28 months ago |
awesome answer Bro K
Cheers mate
Offline
| 28 months ago |
kuyakoy wrote:
a TZ account holder can not mark down the price low enough to move because nike wants to protect its image by price control eg espionage can not markdown sale over 20% i think. so its a catch 22 to have a "TZ" account because you have to move it otherwise it sits there and can not return as unsold unless its defective.
a bigger retail chain however can have a much lower markdown like FL/Rebel where 50% is allowed to move stock. again, they can not return to nike as unsold stock but FL/Rebel can sell its unsold stock to their own outlet.
this is not concrete, there is exceptions that you haven't mentioned, and FL are able to return stock in some cases...
Offline
| 28 months ago |
thanks man. of course there are exceptions. i just want to highlight the difference between the trading terms of the small boutiques to big guys. the bigger chains has more flexibility in moving stock/turnover than small boutiques. the limited editions small boutiques get r supposed to remedy that but as we all know not all LE move when the product is crap. additionally the supplier having a retail arm making them a competitor as well is like a conflict of interest.
any more Q 
=k=
Offline
| 28 months ago |
what about the different countries allocation of stock, is this sometimes random or strategic also, for instance i remember reading about a jordan release where the number of actual units produced was 10,001. now, 5000 of the shoes were split between all countries that are not USA while the USA received 5001 in total
Offline
| 28 months ago |
the US is the biggest market for jordans, pretty standard reason.
just imagine australia sitting on 5000 pairs of a jordan release, a majority will hit the outlets or sale bins.
Offline
| 28 months ago |
Funke wrote:
the US is the biggest market for jordans, pretty standard reason.
just imagine australia sitting on 5000 pairs of a jordan release, a majority will hit the outlets or sale bins.
i didnt see any quai 54's in the sale bins, i saw signs indicating where the line was to start... and the USA didnt recieve any of those...
Offline
| 28 months ago |
or login